Intuitionistic first-order natural deduction and LJ
appendix sectionrules
Intuitionistic first-order natural deduction and LJ
Individual terms and formulas are generated by 𝑡::=𝑥∣𝑓(𝑡1,…,𝑡𝑛),𝐴::=𝑃(𝑡1,…,𝑡𝑛)∣⊥∣𝐴∧𝐴∣𝐴∨𝐴::=∣𝐴→𝐴∣∀𝑥𝐴∣∃𝑥𝐴. Substitution is capture avoiding. Contexts are finite multisets, and every eigenvariable side condition below is part of the rule.
The complete natural-deduction judgment Γ⊢𝖭𝐴 is generated by
𝐴∈Γ
Γ⊢𝖭𝐴
Hyp
Γ⊢𝖭⊥
Γ⊢𝖭𝐴
Bot-E
Γ⊢𝖭𝐴Γ⊢𝖭𝐵
Γ⊢𝖭𝐴∧𝐵
And-I
Γ⊢𝖭𝐴1∧𝐴2
Γ⊢𝖭𝐴𝑖
And-E_i
Γ⊢𝖭𝐴
Γ⊢𝖭𝐴∨𝐵
Or-I_1
Γ⊢𝖭𝐵
Γ⊢𝖭𝐴∨𝐵
Or-I_2
Γ⊢𝖭𝐴∨𝐵Γ,𝐴⊢𝖭𝐶Γ,𝐵⊢𝖭𝐶
Γ⊢𝖭𝐶
Or-E
Γ,𝐴⊢𝖭𝐵
Γ⊢𝖭𝐴→𝐵
Imp-I
Γ⊢𝖭𝐴→𝐵Γ⊢𝖭𝐴
Γ⊢𝖭𝐵
Imp-E
Γ⊢𝖭𝐴[𝑎/𝑥]𝑎∉fv(Γ,∀𝑥𝐴)
Γ⊢𝖭∀𝑥𝐴
All-I
Γ⊢𝖭∀𝑥𝐴
Γ⊢𝖭𝐴[𝑡/𝑥]
All-E
Γ⊢𝖭𝐴[𝑡/𝑥]
Γ⊢𝖭∃𝑥𝐴
Some-I
Γ⊢𝖭∃𝑥𝐴Γ,𝐴[𝑎/𝑥]⊢𝖭𝐶𝑎∉fv(Γ,𝐶,∃𝑥𝐴)
Γ⊢𝖭𝐶
Some-E
LJ sequents have one conclusion. Its structural and logical rules are
Γ,𝐴⇒𝐴
Ax
Γ⇒𝐴Δ,𝐴⇒𝐶
Γ,Δ⇒𝐶
Cut
Γ⇒𝐶
Γ,𝐴⇒𝐶
W-L
Γ,𝐴,𝐴⇒𝐶
Γ,𝐴⇒𝐶
C-L
Γ,⊥⇒𝐶
Bot-L
Γ⇒𝐴Γ⇒𝐵
Γ⇒𝐴∧𝐵
And-R
Γ,𝐴𝑖⇒𝐶
Γ,𝐴1∧𝐴2⇒𝐶
And-L_i
Γ⇒𝐴
Γ⇒𝐴∨𝐵
Or-R_1
Γ⇒𝐵
Γ⇒𝐴∨𝐵
Or-R_2
Γ,𝐴⇒𝐶Γ,𝐵⇒𝐶
Γ,𝐴∨𝐵⇒𝐶
Or-L
Γ,𝐴⇒𝐵
Γ⇒𝐴→𝐵
Imp-R
Γ⇒𝐴Δ,𝐵⇒𝐶
Γ,Δ,𝐴→𝐵⇒𝐶
Imp-L
Γ⇒𝐴[𝑎/𝑥]𝑎∉fv(Γ,∀𝑥𝐴)
Γ⇒∀𝑥𝐴
All-R
Γ,𝐴[𝑡/𝑥]⇒𝐶
Γ,∀𝑥𝐴⇒𝐶
All-L
Γ⇒𝐴[𝑡/𝑥]
Γ⇒∃𝑥𝐴
Some-R
Γ,𝐴[𝑎/𝑥]⇒𝐶𝑎∉fv(Γ,𝐶,∃𝑥𝐴)
Γ,∃𝑥𝐴⇒𝐶
Some-L
For labeled assumptions Ξ=ℎ1:𝐴1,…,ℎ𝑘:𝐴𝑘, proof terms add 𝑝::=ℎ∣𝜆ℎ.𝑝∣𝑝𝑞∣⟨𝑝,𝑞⟩∣𝜋𝑖𝑝∣𝗂𝗇𝑖𝑝∣𝖼𝖺𝗌𝖾(𝑝;ℎ.𝑞;𝑘.𝑟)∣Λ𝑎.𝑝∣𝑝[𝑡]∣𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗄(𝑡,𝑝)∣𝗎𝗇𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗄(𝑝;𝑎,ℎ.𝑞)∣𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗍(𝑝). The propositional constructors use the natural-deduction rules already listed, with proof labels attached. The quantifier and bottom rules are
Ξ⊢𝑝:𝐴[𝑎/𝑥]𝑎∉fv(Ξ,∀𝑥𝐴)
Ξ⊢Λ𝑎.𝑝:∀𝑥𝐴
I
Ξ⊢𝑝:∀𝑥𝐴
Ξ⊢𝑝[𝑡]:𝐴[𝑡/𝑥]
E
Ξ⊢𝑝:𝐴[𝑡/𝑥]
Ξ⊢𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗄(𝑡,𝑝):∃𝑥𝐴
I
Ξ⊢𝑝:∃𝑥𝐴Ξ,ℎ:𝐴[𝑎/𝑥]⊢𝑞:𝐶𝑎∉fv(Ξ,𝐶,∃𝑥𝐴)
Ξ⊢𝗎𝗇𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗄(𝑝;𝑎,ℎ.𝑞):𝐶
E
Ξ⊢𝑝:⊥
Ξ⊢𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗍(𝑝):𝐴
E
The proof-term roots corresponding to principal implication and quantifier cuts are (𝜆ℎ.𝑞)𝑝⇝𝗉𝑞[𝑝/ℎ],(Λ𝑎.𝑞)[𝑡]⇝𝗉𝑞[𝑡/𝑎],𝗎𝗇𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗄(𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗄(𝑡,𝑝);𝑎,ℎ.𝑞)⇝𝗉𝑞[𝑡/𝑎][𝑝/ℎ]. The first-order compatible-context additions are 𝐾::=Λ𝑎.𝐾∣𝐾[𝑡]∣𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗄(𝑡,𝐾)∣𝗎𝗇𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗄(𝐾;𝑎,ℎ.𝑞)∣𝗎𝗇𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗄(𝑝;𝑎,ℎ.𝐾)∣𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗍(𝐾). Together with the propositional contexts, they generate 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑙𝑒𝑟⇝𝗉𝑟′𝐾[𝑟]⟶𝗉𝐾[𝑟′].